They’re NASA and You’re Not!

Gallery

This gallery contains 2 photos.

Public service announcement: As you all know, on September 3rd, in my post, Utah Paranormal and the End of Time, I called for a gathering at a Mayan site on December 21st. I hoped someone famous, like the Ancient Alien … Continue reading

Red Rover, Red Rover, Come On Over

Share

Erosion on Mars as seen by the Mars Rover Photo by NASA

Erosion on Mars as seen by the Mars Rover

NASA photo of Mars with ice (dry ice?) cap
NASA recently announced that the Mars Rover (Red Rover, get it?) had dug up something of historic significance. Not a Buffalo nickel, not Jimmy Hoffa, and not Ylla’s gun that shoots demon bees as this article said in an attempt at humor [article link].
The answer is we don’t know what they will say because NASA is vetting its data so that when it states that it has found life, or signs of life, or more likely, signs of past life; then it will be in a scientifically defensible position.
Remember NASA got shot down by the origins of life theorists when it threatened their grant acquisition status with the declaration that aspects of meteorite ALH84001 “… considered collectively… are evidence of primitive life on early Mars.”
This statement was targeted in a barrage of challenges, when considered collectively, caused NASA to lose face and withdraw its claim. I remain unconvinced that NASA was wrong, but like in a court of law, it was expected to prove beyond a doubt that it was right.
Unfortunately, much of scientific truth is determined by the rhetoric of key figures as received by a jury of their less creative and insightful, possibly even politically motivated, peers. Ultimately the truth wins based on irrefutable evidence. Up until then, the detractors will dig in and go for one more government grant to strengthen a position that they may already see is a loser, but someone has to keep bread on the table, right?
The Mars Rover depicted on a Martian-like landscape

The Mars Rover depicted on a Martian-like landscape

Given the number of loser programs sponsored with our government money, don’t you think NASA would continue to be funded? The mission to Mars is to our future like Lucy climbing down out of the tree was to our present. And just like Lucy, some of what they learn will be critical to our survival.
There are a ton of wonderful discoveries about Mars that NASA could announce and any one of them would be historic. Heck, the fact that the rover is there and functioning as planned is historic, but they are going to announce life on Mars aren’t they? After all, this is a grudge match isn’t it?
Link to We’re NASA and We Know It

Mars and Ice

Share

First it’s getting to Mars. A friend sent me this Utube video, a simulation of the Curiosity launch, flight, and touchdown. It appears to have been created at NASA, as it has real scenes in the control center. If you haven’t gotten it yet, then take a look, it beats most of the sci-fi films you pay to see.
Wouldn’t it have been fun to be the subcontractor, probably SpaceX, who flew along side and filmed the flight? And what about the air bags around the landing module? Just like the landing in Red Planet. In fact they should have spliced in that part of the sci-fi film. Probably couldn’t get the rights without paying bundles of money. The simulation does fine. Wonder what it cost them?
And, yes, I am very critical of sci-fi movies and TV shows, classifying most of them as candidates for Deep Six, leaving these few in the great category: Alien (original), Predator (original), Red Planet (Val Kilmer), Fifth Element (Milla Jovovich, how could you not like it?), Galaxy Quest (better than the Star Trek films it satirizes), Men in Black (all of them), Mars Attacks. and I can’t believe I’m saying this, the second Battlestar Galactica (beats Lost, a bitterly disappointing conclusion), The Island of Dr. Moreau, another good one with Kilmer and Brando, and Grimm is better than Fringe. Well you may not like my list and may not be able to figure out just what I like, but neither can I.
So back to Mars. Recent observations [see article here= Mars Ice] have seen dry ice snowing down on the southern Martian ice cap (so which is north and which is south on Mars?). There is also regular ice on Mars’s ice caps as well.
First thing that came to my mind is that we just need an ice age to clean the CO2 out of our atmosphere. Ironically, Mars needs to keep the CO2 in its atmosphere to warm the planet since its polar temperature is -193 Fahrenheit, the temperature required to freeze CO2 and why it snows dry ice.
Then I wondered, are we in sync with Mars? When Mars snows dry ice, does Earth’s average temperature also drop? Could studying Mars help us understand our climate? Our climate is complicated by water and air, their associated currents, biological and human activity. Mars has none of these complications, so observing Mars might reveal the pure solar system effects on climate. Maybe we need to send a missile to Mars that is equipped with a MIRV-like warhead, delivering probes in an array over the planet’s surface. These would gather data to model the Red Planet’s climate and hopefully provide us with a calibration point for Earth’s climate.
So which great sci-fi films did I miss? Oh yeah, good luck Curiosity, live long and find life.

Curiosity—What Will Be Found

Gallery

The Have no doubt about it, we are seeing the science equivalent of a massive battle flotilla forming off the shores of Normandy. NASA is about to claim the field in “Origin of Life” theories. Their Allan Hills foray, the … Continue reading